Saturday, March 29, 2008
Is Wright Right About Racism?
http://www.creators.com/opinion/david-sirota/is-wright-right-about-racism.ht
http://www.creators.com/opinion/david-sirota/is-wright-right-about-racism.h
tml>
Is Wright Right About Racism?
By David Sirota
Creators Syndicate, 3/28/08
Since the 1960s, bigotry has undergone an aesthetic makeover. Today,
the most pernicious racists do not wear pointy hoods, scream epithets
and anonymously burn crosses from behind masks. They don starched
suits, recite sententious bromides and stage political lynchings
before television cameras. For proof, behold the mob stalking Barack
Obama's former pastor, Jeremiah Wright.
Wright has long delivered fiery (and occasionally outrageous)
sermons, to little fanfare. Now, though, a gang of thugs is
inflicting a guilt-by-association blow to Obama by excoriating his
spiritual adviser for three specific declarations.
Sean Hannity, Fox News' own George Wallace, turned a fire hose on
Wright for his church's focus. " is all about the black
community," Hannity thundered, claiming that means Wright supports "a
black-separatist agenda."
Pat Buchanan billy-clubbed Wright for saying, "God damn America." The
MSNBC commentator, who avoided the draft, implied that Wright, a
former Marine, lacks sufficient loyalty to country. Out of context,
Wright's exclamation was admittedly offensive. But remember: It
punctuated a speech about segregation. Buchanan, nonetheless,
unleashed, deriding "black hustlers" and insisting descendants of
those "brought from Africa in slave ships" owe whites a thank you.
"Where is the gratitude?" he asked.
Fox's Charles Krauthammer berated Wright for saying the 9/11 attacks
were "chickens coming home to roost." Krauthammer labeled the
pronouncement "vitriolic divisiveness" despite our government
acknowledging the concept of "blowback" or retaliation Wright was
referencing. The CIA knows that when it supports foreign
dictatorships, there can be blowback from radicals. While blowback is
often immoral and undeserved, its existence is undisputed. Yet,
Krauthammer alleged that Wright takes "satisfaction in the deaths of
3,000 innocents."
In promoting the Wright "controversy," most media outlets joined this
mob and embraced "colorblind racism," says Duke University's Eduardo
Bonilla-Silva, author of "Racism Without Racists."
It is polite pinstriped prejudice shrouding bigotry in feigned
outrage against extremism the operative word being "feigned." After
all, John McCain solicited the endorsement of John Hagee the pastor
who called the Catholic Church "a great whore." Similarly, according
to Mother Jones magazine, Hillary Clinton belongs to the "Fellowship"
a secretive group "dedicated to 'spiritual war' on behalf of
Christ." She is also friendly with Billy Graham, the reverend caught
on tape spewing anti-Semitism. But while Wright's supposed
"extremism" blankets the news, McCain and Clinton's relationships
with real extremists receive scant attention.
Why is it "controversial" for one pastor to address the black
community, racism and blowback, but OK for another pastor to slander
an entire religion? Why is it news that one candidate knows a
sometimes-impolitic clergyman, but not news that his opponent
associates with an anti-Semite? Does the double standard prove the
dominant culture despises a black man confronting taboos, but accepts
whites spewing hate? Does the very reaction to Wright show he's right
about racism?
Clinton seems to think so. Her aides have been calling the states
they believe Obama will lose their political "firewall." That's
campaign-speak for "race wall" one built with bricks like
Pennsylvania and Indiana. These aren't the near-purely white states
where racial politics is often muted (and Obama won). They are the
slightly diverse states where racial politics simmers and where the
black vote is too small to offset a motivated racist vote. This race
wall is now being fortified.
ABC News reports that Clinton's campaign is "pushing the Wright
story" ahead of the Pennsylvania and Indiana primaries. The crass
tactic is designed to motivate the racist vote by reminding whites of
Obama's connection to the African-American community. Put another way,
Clinton's message has become simply: Obama Is Black.
Wright probably expected this brouhaha. He says our government is
"controlled by rich white people" and our culture afflicted by
racism. Though these statements are also deemed distasteful by the
Establishment, they are truisms. You can see their veracity in the
collected portraits of white millionaires commonly called the
congressional photo directory. Or, just turn on your television and
watch the mob continue stoking the Wright "controversy."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)